fixed some race conditions in the scheduler (#411)

master
Francisco Paisana 6 years ago committed by Andre Puschmann
parent c51a8bfe9d
commit 4ba1993815

@ -744,7 +744,9 @@ int sched::dl_sched_data(dl_sched_data_t data[MAX_DATA_LIST])
uint32_t pending_tti = tti_rx_ack % 10;
if (cfg.cell.nof_prb == 6 and (srslte_prach_tti_opportunity_config_fdd(cfg.prach_config, tti_rx_ack, -1) or
pending_msg3[pending_tti].enabled)) {
start_rbg = avail_rbg;
start_rbg = nof_rbg;
avail_rbg = 0;
log_h->debug("SCHED: Skip tti=%d, as it would cause a conflict between PUCCH and PRACH\n", current_tti);
}
typedef std::map<uint16_t, sched_ue>::iterator it_t;
@ -761,9 +763,6 @@ int sched::dl_sched_data(dl_sched_data_t data[MAX_DATA_LIST])
int nof_data_elems = 0;
for (it_t iter = ue_db.begin(); iter != ue_db.end(); ++iter) {
sched_ue* user = (sched_ue*)&iter->second;
/**
* Tests whether the RAR and Msg3 were scheduled within the expected windows
*/
uint16_t rnti = (uint16_t) iter->first;
dl_harq_proc* h = user->get_dl_alloc();
@ -853,6 +852,11 @@ int sched::dl_sched(uint32_t tti, sched_interface::dl_sched_res_t* sched_result)
uint32_t tti_rx = (tti + 10240 - TX_DELAY) % 10240;
sched_vars::tti_vars_t* tti_vars = &sched_vars.new_tti(tti_rx);
bzero(sched_result, sizeof(sched_interface::dl_sched_res_t));
pthread_mutex_lock(&sched_mutex);
pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&rwlock);
/* Initialize variables */
current_tti = tti;
sfn = tti / 10;
@ -862,10 +866,6 @@ int sched::dl_sched(uint32_t tti, sched_interface::dl_sched_res_t* sched_result)
current_cfi = sched_cfg.nof_ctrl_symbols;
bc_aggr_level = 2;
rar_aggr_level = 2;
bzero(sched_result, sizeof(sched_interface::dl_sched_res_t));
pthread_mutex_lock(&sched_mutex);
pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&rwlock);
/* Schedule Broadcast data */
sched_result->nof_bc_elems += dl_sched_bc(sched_result->bc);
@ -922,6 +922,12 @@ int sched::ul_sched(uint32_t tti, srsenb::sched_interface::ul_sched_res_t* sched
uint32_t tti_rx = (tti + 10240 - 2 * FDD_HARQ_DELAY_MS) % 10240;
sched_vars::tti_vars_t* tti_vars = &sched_vars.new_tti(tti_rx);
// current_cfi is set in dl_sched()
bzero(sched_result, sizeof(sched_interface::ul_sched_res_t));
pthread_mutex_lock(&sched_mutex);
pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&rwlock);
/* Initialize variables */
current_tti = tti;
sfn = tti/10;
@ -933,12 +939,6 @@ int sched::ul_sched(uint32_t tti, srsenb::sched_interface::ul_sched_res_t* sched
int nof_dci_elems = 0;
int nof_phich_elems = 0;
// current_cfi is set in dl_sched()
bzero(sched_result, sizeof(sched_interface::ul_sched_res_t));
pthread_mutex_lock(&sched_mutex);
pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&rwlock);
// clear previous UL allocations
for (it_t it = ue_db.begin(); it != ue_db.end(); ++it) {
it->second.set_ul_alloc(NULL);

@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ bool dl_harq_proc::has_pending_retx(uint32_t tb_idx, uint32_t current_tti) const
{
uint32_t tti_diff = srslte_tti_interval(current_tti, tti);
// NOTE: tti may be ahead of current_tti due to thread flip
return tti_diff < 10240 / 2 and tti_diff >= (SRSLTE_FDD_NOF_HARQ) && !is_empty(tb_idx);
return (tti_diff < (10240 / 2)) and (tti_diff >= SRSLTE_FDD_NOF_HARQ) and !is_empty(tb_idx);
}
int dl_harq_proc::get_tbs(uint32_t tb_idx) const

@ -974,7 +974,8 @@ bool sched_ue::is_sr_triggered()
void sched_ue::reset_timeout_dl_harq(uint32_t tti) {
for (int i=0;i<SCHED_MAX_HARQ_PROC;i++) {
if (!(dl_harq[i].is_empty(0) && dl_harq[i].is_empty(1))) {
if (srslte_tti_interval(tti, dl_harq[i].get_tti()) > 50) {
uint32_t tti_diff = srslte_tti_interval(tti, dl_harq[i].get_tti());
if (tti_diff > 50 and tti_diff < 10240 / 2) {
log_h->info("SCHED: pid=%d is old. tti_pid=%d, now is %d, resetting\n", i, dl_harq[i].get_tti(), tti);
dl_harq[i].reset(0);
dl_harq[i].reset(1);

Loading…
Cancel
Save