we had it returning int but had a bug in using the return value properly,
i.e. handling when -1 was returned in RLC TM.
Thinking about it more, it doesn't make sense to have a negative return
value here anyway. Either the RLC can return a PDU or not. If it can't the
returned lenght is zero.
general-purpose method for lower layers to signal protocol
failures to higher layers, i.e. RRC.
In the current case, implement a direct release of the UE (enb) or
a reestablishment (UE).
races detected with TSAN, primarily the ue_sync object which isn't
thread-safe is accessed by all workers to set the CFO and by the
sync thread to receive samples (which read the CFO).
The patch introduces shadow variables that are updates from the
main thread before/after the sync is executed. The atomic shadow
variables can then be read from otherthreads without holding a
mutex, i.e. blocking the sync.
in the mac_test the tb_decoded() method was called twice for
the 2nd codeword, causig TSAN to complain about an unlocked mutex
being unlocked.
The patch resolves the potential issue only calling tb_decoded
for a grant/tb thas has a non-zero MCS.
The patch also adjusts the reset function to have a safe and "unsafe"
version to be called from inside the class, similar to other
classes where we do the same.
this is an attempt to fix#2850 by defering the transmission of
the connection setup complete until the PHY has applied
the dedicated config in the connection setup.
- the consumer does multi-staged waiting:
1. spins first across all queues in a RR fashion
2. each queue access is done with a try_lock.
3. if the try_lock fails, it increases the number of spins needed
2. if no queue had data, the consumer sleeps for 100 usec.
- no differentiation between queues, in terms of notification features
preperation for Split bearer support. This patch is needed to allow
split bearer. Otherwise, even if the config is set in the eNB, it
will not enable split bearers.
With the new design, each queue created in the multiqueue object has its own mutex.
Pushing tasks to separate queues will, therefore, not cause contention.
There will be, however, still contention between the popping thread and the pushing threads.