rlc_am_test: fix max_retx test

the test should only check the correct signaling of the maxretx
to the upper layer.
master
Andre Puschmann 4 years ago
parent ceacf8508d
commit 83f24fbf77

@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ int retx_test()
return 0;
}
// Test correct RLC AM handling when maxRetx (default 4) have been reached
// Test correct upper layer signaling when maxRetx (default 4) have been reached
int max_retx_test()
{
rlc_am_tester tester;
@ -557,6 +557,9 @@ int max_retx_test()
// We've Tx'ed once already, loop until the max is reached
for (uint32_t retx_count = 0; retx_count < rlc_cfg.am.max_retx_thresh; ++retx_count) {
// we've not yet reached max attempts
TESTASSERT(tester.max_retx_triggered == false);
// Write status PDU to RLC1
rlc1.write_pdu(status_pdu.msg, status_pdu.N_bytes);
@ -564,24 +567,10 @@ int max_retx_test()
len = rlc1.read_pdu(pdu_buf.msg, 3);
}
// Write last status PDU to RLC1
rlc1.write_pdu(status_pdu.msg, status_pdu.N_bytes);
// RLC should be done, no further transmissions are allowed
TESTASSERT(0 == rlc1.get_buffer_state());
// Check also that trying to read a PDU will return nothing
byte_buffer_t pdu_buf;
TESTASSERT(0 == rlc1.read_pdu(pdu_buf.msg, 3));
// Sanity check, we now ACK all SNs
fake_status.N_nack = 0; // all received
rlc_am_write_status_pdu(&fake_status, &status_pdu);
rlc1.write_pdu(status_pdu.msg, status_pdu.N_bytes);
TESTASSERT(0 == rlc1.read_pdu(pdu_buf.msg, 3));
// Now maxRetx should have been triggered
TESTASSERT(tester.max_retx_triggered == true);
return 0;
return SRSLTE_SUCCESS;
}
// Purpose: test correct retx of lost segment and pollRetx timer expiration

Loading…
Cancel
Save