|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* \section COPYRIGHT
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright 2013-2020 Software Radio Systems Limited
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* By using this file, you agree to the terms and conditions set
|
|
|
|
* forth in the LICENSE file which can be found at the top level of
|
|
|
|
* the distribution.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef SRSUE_PROC_BSR_H
|
|
|
|
#define SRSUE_PROC_BSR_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <map>
|
|
|
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "proc_sr.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "srslte/common/task_scheduler.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "srslte/srslog/srslog.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Buffer status report procedure */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace srsue {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class rlc_interface_mac;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// BSR interface for MUX
|
|
|
|
class bsr_interface_mux
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
typedef enum { LONG_BSR, SHORT_BSR, TRUNC_BSR } bsr_format_t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
bsr_format_t format;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t buff_size[4];
|
|
|
|
} bsr_t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* MUX calls BSR to check if it should send (and can fit) a BSR into PDU */
|
|
|
|
virtual bool need_to_send_bsr_on_ul_grant(uint32_t grant_size, uint32_t total_data, bsr_t* bsr) = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* MUX calls BSR to let it generate a padding BSR if there is space in PDU */
|
|
|
|
virtual bool generate_padding_bsr(uint32_t nof_padding_bytes, bsr_t* bsr) = 0;
|
proc_bsr: fix race condition in BSR reporting
fix for #1934
This fixes a race condition between Stack thread and DL
PDU processing that lead to updates of the RLC buffer that
are undetected by the BSR routine.
What happens is that in a UL SCH PDU all outstanding data is transmitted
and and a LBSR with all zero buffers is sent.
14:39:47.327301 [MAC ] [D] [ 3793] BSR: LCID=3 old_buffer=59
14:39:47.330600 [MAC ] [I] [ 3793] UL LCID=3 len=58 LBSR: b=0 0 0 0
Note that "old_buffer" isn't set to zero here.
At the same time (same TTI), the MAC PDU processing thread handles DL-SCH PDUs
that may generate new UL PDUs:
14:39:47.330749 [RLC ] [I] DRB1 Tx SDU (54 B, tx_sdu_queue_len=1)
14:39:47.330762 [RLC ] [I] DRB1 Tx SDU (54 B, tx_sdu_queue_len=2)
14:39:47.330775 [RLC ] [I] DRB1 Tx SDU (54 B, tx_sdu_queue_len=3)
..
Those PDUs are "new data" since the previous buffer state was zero.
Here is the race now between the threads, at the end of the bsr::step() function
old_buffer of each LCG is updated with the previous new_buffer, so
the buffer state of LCG=2 is now 59.
Now MAC starts the next TTI:
14:39:47.331910 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Running MAC tti=3794
14:39:47.331928 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=0, Bj=0
14:39:47.331934 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=1, Bj=0
14:39:47.331938 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=2, Bj=0
14:39:47.331941 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=3, Bj=-1752
14:39:47.331951 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=0 update new buffer=0
14:39:47.331960 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=1 update new buffer=0
14:39:47.331964 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=2 update new buffer=0
14:39:47.331971 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=3 update new buffer=335
14:39:47.331976 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(0)=0
14:39:47.331980 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(1)=0
14:39:47.331984 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(2)=59
14:39:47.331988 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(3)=0
14:39:47.331993 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=0 old_buffer=0
14:39:47.332000 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=1 old_buffer=0
14:39:47.332003 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=2 old_buffer=0
14:39:47.332007 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=3 old_buffer=335
And since the buffer state of LCG=2 isn't zero, the new data for LCID=3 of that LCG is considered.
So effectivly, the BSR missed the "empty" buffer state for a fraction of time and doesn't
consider the outgoing data generated in the same TTI as new. It therefore
doesn't transmit a BSR.
in which a BSR wasn't
4 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* MUX calls BSR to update buffer state of each LCG after all PDUs for this TTI have been packed */
|
|
|
|
virtual void update_bsr_tti_end(const bsr_t* bsr) = 0;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class bsr_proc : public srslte::timer_callback, public bsr_interface_mux
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
explicit bsr_proc(srslog::basic_logger& logger) : logger(logger) {}
|
|
|
|
void init(sr_proc* sr_proc, rlc_interface_mac* rlc, srslte::ext_task_sched_handle* task_sched_);
|
|
|
|
void step(uint32_t tti);
|
|
|
|
void reset();
|
|
|
|
void set_config(srslte::bsr_cfg_t& bsr_cfg);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void setup_lcid(uint32_t lcid, uint32_t lcg, uint32_t priority);
|
|
|
|
void timer_expired(uint32_t timer_id);
|
|
|
|
uint32_t get_buffer_state();
|
|
|
|
bool need_to_send_bsr_on_ul_grant(uint32_t grant_size, uint32_t total_data, bsr_t* bsr);
|
|
|
|
bool generate_padding_bsr(uint32_t nof_padding_bytes, bsr_t* bsr);
|
proc_bsr: fix race condition in BSR reporting
fix for #1934
This fixes a race condition between Stack thread and DL
PDU processing that lead to updates of the RLC buffer that
are undetected by the BSR routine.
What happens is that in a UL SCH PDU all outstanding data is transmitted
and and a LBSR with all zero buffers is sent.
14:39:47.327301 [MAC ] [D] [ 3793] BSR: LCID=3 old_buffer=59
14:39:47.330600 [MAC ] [I] [ 3793] UL LCID=3 len=58 LBSR: b=0 0 0 0
Note that "old_buffer" isn't set to zero here.
At the same time (same TTI), the MAC PDU processing thread handles DL-SCH PDUs
that may generate new UL PDUs:
14:39:47.330749 [RLC ] [I] DRB1 Tx SDU (54 B, tx_sdu_queue_len=1)
14:39:47.330762 [RLC ] [I] DRB1 Tx SDU (54 B, tx_sdu_queue_len=2)
14:39:47.330775 [RLC ] [I] DRB1 Tx SDU (54 B, tx_sdu_queue_len=3)
..
Those PDUs are "new data" since the previous buffer state was zero.
Here is the race now between the threads, at the end of the bsr::step() function
old_buffer of each LCG is updated with the previous new_buffer, so
the buffer state of LCG=2 is now 59.
Now MAC starts the next TTI:
14:39:47.331910 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Running MAC tti=3794
14:39:47.331928 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=0, Bj=0
14:39:47.331934 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=1, Bj=0
14:39:47.331938 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=2, Bj=0
14:39:47.331941 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=3, Bj=-1752
14:39:47.331951 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=0 update new buffer=0
14:39:47.331960 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=1 update new buffer=0
14:39:47.331964 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=2 update new buffer=0
14:39:47.331971 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=3 update new buffer=335
14:39:47.331976 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(0)=0
14:39:47.331980 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(1)=0
14:39:47.331984 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(2)=59
14:39:47.331988 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(3)=0
14:39:47.331993 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=0 old_buffer=0
14:39:47.332000 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=1 old_buffer=0
14:39:47.332003 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=2 old_buffer=0
14:39:47.332007 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=3 old_buffer=335
And since the buffer state of LCG=2 isn't zero, the new data for LCID=3 of that LCG is considered.
So effectivly, the BSR missed the "empty" buffer state for a fraction of time and doesn't
consider the outgoing data generated in the same TTI as new. It therefore
doesn't transmit a BSR.
in which a BSR wasn't
4 years ago
|
|
|
void update_bsr_tti_end(const bsr_t* bsr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
const static int QUEUE_STATUS_PERIOD_MS = 1000;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::mutex mutex;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
srslte::ext_task_sched_handle* task_sched = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
srslog::basic_logger& logger;
|
|
|
|
rlc_interface_mac* rlc = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
sr_proc* sr = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
srslte::bsr_cfg_t bsr_cfg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool initiated = false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const static int NOF_LCG = 4;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
int priority;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t old_buffer;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t new_buffer;
|
|
|
|
} lcid_t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::map<uint32_t, lcid_t> lcgs[NOF_LCG]; // groups LCID in LCG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uint32_t find_max_priority_lcg_with_data();
|
|
|
|
typedef enum { NONE, REGULAR, PADDING, PERIODIC } triggered_bsr_type_t;
|
|
|
|
triggered_bsr_type_t triggered_bsr_type = NONE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void print_state();
|
|
|
|
void set_trigger(triggered_bsr_type_t new_trigger);
|
|
|
|
void update_new_data();
|
proc_bsr: fix race condition in BSR reporting
fix for #1934
This fixes a race condition between Stack thread and DL
PDU processing that lead to updates of the RLC buffer that
are undetected by the BSR routine.
What happens is that in a UL SCH PDU all outstanding data is transmitted
and and a LBSR with all zero buffers is sent.
14:39:47.327301 [MAC ] [D] [ 3793] BSR: LCID=3 old_buffer=59
14:39:47.330600 [MAC ] [I] [ 3793] UL LCID=3 len=58 LBSR: b=0 0 0 0
Note that "old_buffer" isn't set to zero here.
At the same time (same TTI), the MAC PDU processing thread handles DL-SCH PDUs
that may generate new UL PDUs:
14:39:47.330749 [RLC ] [I] DRB1 Tx SDU (54 B, tx_sdu_queue_len=1)
14:39:47.330762 [RLC ] [I] DRB1 Tx SDU (54 B, tx_sdu_queue_len=2)
14:39:47.330775 [RLC ] [I] DRB1 Tx SDU (54 B, tx_sdu_queue_len=3)
..
Those PDUs are "new data" since the previous buffer state was zero.
Here is the race now between the threads, at the end of the bsr::step() function
old_buffer of each LCG is updated with the previous new_buffer, so
the buffer state of LCG=2 is now 59.
Now MAC starts the next TTI:
14:39:47.331910 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Running MAC tti=3794
14:39:47.331928 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=0, Bj=0
14:39:47.331934 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=1, Bj=0
14:39:47.331938 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=2, Bj=0
14:39:47.331941 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] Update Bj: lcid=3, Bj=-1752
14:39:47.331951 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=0 update new buffer=0
14:39:47.331960 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=1 update new buffer=0
14:39:47.331964 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=2 update new buffer=0
14:39:47.331971 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=3 update new buffer=335
14:39:47.331976 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(0)=0
14:39:47.331980 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(1)=0
14:39:47.331984 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(2)=59
14:39:47.331988 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: check_new_data() -> get_buffer_state_lcg(3)=0
14:39:47.331993 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=0 old_buffer=0
14:39:47.332000 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=1 old_buffer=0
14:39:47.332003 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=2 old_buffer=0
14:39:47.332007 [MAC ] [D] [ 3794] BSR: LCID=3 old_buffer=335
And since the buffer state of LCG=2 isn't zero, the new data for LCID=3 of that LCG is considered.
So effectivly, the BSR missed the "empty" buffer state for a fraction of time and doesn't
consider the outgoing data generated in the same TTI as new. It therefore
doesn't transmit a BSR.
in which a BSR wasn't
4 years ago
|
|
|
void update_old_buffer();
|
|
|
|
bool check_highest_channel();
|
|
|
|
bool check_new_data();
|
|
|
|
bool check_any_channel();
|
|
|
|
uint32_t get_buffer_state_lcg(uint32_t lcg);
|
|
|
|
bool generate_bsr(bsr_t* bsr, uint32_t nof_padding_bytes);
|
|
|
|
char* bsr_type_tostring(triggered_bsr_type_t type);
|
|
|
|
char* bsr_format_tostring(bsr_format_t format);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
srslte::timer_handler::unique_timer timer_periodic;
|
|
|
|
srslte::timer_handler::unique_timer timer_retx;
|
|
|
|
srslte::timer_handler::unique_timer timer_queue_status_print;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace srsue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif // SRSUE_PROC_BSR_H
|